Less is More?
Yet do much less, so much less, Someone says,Robert Browning was an English poet and playwright during the Victorian era known for his dramatic monologues. In 1855, he wrote a poem called “Andrea Del Sarto” named after Renassance painter known for his technical skills, but his paintings often lacked emotional qualities and “soul” that many critics say prevented him from achieving the same fame as Michelangelo, Da Vinci or Raphael. Browning’s poem is written as if Del Sarto is speaking to his wife, Lucrezia.
(I know his name, no matter)--so much less!
Well, less is more, Lucrezia: I am judged.
—Robert Browning, from the poem “Andrea Del Sarto”
Ludwig Mies Van der Rohe was a German-American architect known for pioneering the 20th century architectural style known for it’s minimalism and clarity. Unlike his contemporaries, his buildings utilized modern materials like glass, steel, and concrete. His designs stripped away all the superfluous ornamentation and excessive details to create what he called “skin and bones” architecture. He is famous for his use of the aphorism “Less is more” which, despite often being credited as it’s source, is lifted from Robert Browning’s poem about Andrea Del Sarto.
The phrase “less is more” has become the muse that all minimalist design rests on. Minimalist design, at it’s core, is about removing as many elements as possible, leaving only what is necessary. The French writer Antoine de Saint Exupéry put it this way: “A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.”
When someone says “less is more” the idea is that by showing (designing, including, etc) less, you are actually getting more impact. The problem with the phrase “less is more” is that it implies “more” is still the goal; still the desired outcome. Is more really that much better? Can’t less be just less?
More isn’t always better. A product with more features, but subpar performance probably isn’t better than a product that does only one thing and that one thing really well. Perhaps a design is understated because it wants to be understated.
Dieter Rams, in his Ten Principles For Good Design manifesto, took a slightly different approach. Instead of “less is more,” he says “Good design is as little design as possible. Less, but better—because it concentrates on the essential aspects, and the products are not burdened with non-essentials. Back to purity, back to simplicity.” Less, but better. I like that.
Less isn’t always more. Less doesn’t need to be more. Sometimes less is just less.
Less, but better.








